When Seconds Count

Fireground mayday incidents are among the most critical and time-sensitive challenges in the fire service. A mayday is declared when a firefighter becomes lost, trapped, injured or otherwise endangered. These emergencies are high-stress and low-frequency, meaning they occur rarely but carry extraordinary consequences when they do. In these moments every second counts, and every member of the emergency response system has a role to play.

Traditional fireground training for maydays emphasizes suppression crews and command staff. Yet public safety telecommunicators (PSTs) are often overlooked despite their critical responsibilities in managing communications during these life-or-death events. Excluding telecommunicators from mayday training creates gaps in coordination and readiness that can jeopardize firefighter safety.

When a mayday is declared, it initiates a cascade of actions. Rapid intervention teams (RIT) are deployed, incident commanders adjust strategies, accountability systems must be maintained and additional resources are often requested. All of this unfolds while fire conditions may be worsening, victims remain unaccounted for, and crews continue to operate on the fireground.

Because the mayday is so rare, firefighters and telecommunicators alike may lack the muscle memory needed for rapid response. Unlike routine calls, these events require immediate recognition, unwavering clarity in communication and seamless coordination between telecommunicators and field units.

Communication becomes the lifeline. A firefighter in distress may be panicked, disoriented or struggling to breathe. In these scenarios, the telecommunicator’s role is operational. They ensure the transmission is heard, prioritized and acted upon. They manage resources, track RIT movements and serve as the hub of information for all responding agencies. To fulfill that role effectively, telecommunicators must train with the same urgency and realism as firefighters.

The telecommunicator’s role in mayday incidents

Telecommunicators are often the first to hear a mayday declaration, whether it comes directly from a firefighter or is relayed through command. Their duties at these moments can include:

• Confirming and acknowledging the mayday on the correct radio channel.
• Alerting the incident commander and ensuring mayday traffic is given priority.
• Dispatching or tracking the RIT and additional resources.
• Coordinating mutual aid, additional alarms and outside agencies.
• Maintaining accurate timestamps and logs, which become vital in after-action reviews.

Despite these responsibilities, many agencies still exclude telecommunicators from live-fire training or mayday drills. This omission can leave telecommunicators unprepared for the unique stress, terminology and decision-making required during a real mayday.

Why integration into training matters

Bringing telecommunicators into mayday training exercises yields measurable improvements in performance on the fireground. When they participate in liveburn or simulated drills, telecommunicators gain familiarity with the rapid pace and heavy radio traffic that accompany mayday incidents. These realistic scenarios give them the chance to practice managing competing priorities under pressure, building the same kind of muscle memory that firefighters develop.

Joint training also improves interoperability. When telecommunicators understand the flow of fireground operations — such as when a personnel accountability report (PAR) is called or when a RIT is deployed — they can anticipate command needs instead of simply reacting to them. That foresight enhances coordination and shortens response times.

"Ultimately, fireground maydays are rare but devastating events that expose weaknesses in training, equipment and coordination."

‍

Training side by side with firefighters also sharpens situational awareness. Telecommunicators who have experienced fireground simulations are better attuned to subtle warning signs in radio traffic, from muffled voices and repeated transmissions to the sound of labored breathing. Recognizing these cues early can save valuable seconds in a rescue.

Equally important, joint exercises strengthen team cohesion. They help break down barriers between the communications center and the fireground, reinforcing the role of telecommunicators as operational partners rather than distant support staff. This collaboration carries into post-incident analysis as well. When telecommunicators participate in after-action reviews, their perspective on resource management, radio traffic and logging provides critical depth. Their insights often reveal gaps that may not be visible to those on the fireground.

A mayday case study: Auburn fire rescue

Real-world incidents highlight the need for better integration of telecommunicators into mayday training. In January 2016, the Auburn Fire Rescue Department in Massachusetts responded on mutual aid to a residential fire in a neighboring community.

Two Auburn firefighters were operating on the second floor when conditions deteriorated, forcing a mayday. The lieutenant transmitted the mayday on the wrong channel, which was not being monitored on the fireground. Twice, the call went unanswered. Fortunately, the transmission was picked up by an emergency communications center (ECC) in another town and by a mutual aid crew covering a nearby station. They notified the command, which triggered a response.

In the meantime, both firefighters were forced to self-extricate by bailing out a window onto a lower roof.

Chief Stephen Coleman recalled the incident as both a success and a learning opportunity. "The fact that both our members are alive today shows there were successes that night, but not everything went perfectly," Coleman said.

Several communication issues emerged:

• Dispatch delay. The initial 9-1-1 call lasted more than two minutes before fire resources were dispatched. A police officer was sent first to confirm the fire. Those three minutes allowed the fire to intensify significantly. Modern station alerting technology can enable call takers to dispatch fire units while continuing to gather information from the caller.
• Information gaps. Police reported that all occupants had exited the building, but that message was not relayed to the fire department. As a result, crews initiated a search for victims who were already accounted for.
• Radio channel management. The lieutenant’s portable radio knob was inadvertently bumped, switching to a channel not monitored by dispatch. Radios should be programmed to minimize access to unused channels, and hardware should be designed to prevent accidental changes.

The Auburn incident illustrates how even a brief miscommunication can escalate danger during a mayday.

Lessons for the fire service

Fireground maydays test every link in the chain of emergency response. To improve survivability, the fire service must formally integrate telecommunicators into mayday preparedness.

This begins with establishing joint training policies that require telecommunicators to participate in mayday drills alongside fire crews. Integration also means incorporating telecommunicators’ responsibilities directly into standard operating guidelines for rapid RITs and mayday events.

Another critical step is ensuring that ECCs have access to the same terminology, checklists and benchmarks used by fire department command staff. After-action reviews must also include communications personnel as equal participants. External to the fire service, the eventual formal recognition of telecommunicators as first responders will demonstrate the true scope of their responsibilities to all public safety services, resulting in better cohesion in situations such as maydays.

Ultimately, fireground maydays are rare but devastating events that expose weaknesses in training, equipment and coordination. Every agency hopes never to face one but must prepare for the possibility that it will someday.

By training telecommunicators and firefighters together, agencies create a unified team that communicates more effectively, reacts more quickly and manages resources more efficiently. The inclusion of telecommunicators is not optional; it is essential.

When the call comes and a firefighter’s life hangs in the balance, success will depend on whether every member of the emergency response system, on the ground and on the radio, is prepared.

It is not only about working together. It is about training together.

‍